ABDUI RAZIQ versus SARANJAM
Section 13 of the NWFP Pre-Emission Act 1987 delayed the testimony of the victim to testify that the plaintiff had acquired knowledge of the sale transaction on the same day, ie, on 10-10, 1989, when the question was changed. It was confirmed that the plaintiff himself alleged that he had delayed eight days of knowledge of the sale transaction, not on 10-10 1989 but when he had confirmed the ponding on May 10, 1989. , It didn't happen immediately and immediately. Failure to make an urgent claim, pre-emptor pre-emption right was lost. The lower courts failed to consider this aspect, dismissing their investigation and suing for misrepresentation of evidence.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Mithi lawyer
