Find a Lawyer

ZAHIR SHAH versus ZAHIR SHAH

Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 302/394 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement of Hoodwood) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 174 (4) Testimony of Evidence Two-eyed witnesses who provided an account in this case. Although related to the deceased, there were still natural witnesses who presented a straightforward and straightforward version of the incident, as well as the testimony of the other witness, who also gave an account of the case because he was incompetent and on independent witness and defense records. Was either an abnormal move against the accused or had an ulterior motive to trap them wrongly. The FIR was filed by the widow of the deceased shortly after the deceased, in which the accused was charged with domestic crime and murder of her husband. Expressing his condemnation on behalf of the accused, he recovered the stolen jewelry belonging to the deceased widow who married the victim only 5/6 months ago. 3 wounds were shown, which has led to the full support of ocular evidence, as evidenced by eyewitnesses. And the two freelance criminals, who were convicted of robbery and robbery, who were convicted of murder and murder, were properly punished under these two offenses and proved completely against them. top civil advocates from Dhatmal lawyer