SAID MUHAMMAD versus ABDUR REHMAN
Contract Act 1872 Section 551 Transfer of Property Act (I82 of I82), S53 A Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 12 The contract price to sell the land was to be paid on the balance date when the sale was made. When the act was to be executed, the claimant was allotted; after a certain date the property rights were transferred to him and he refused to perform his part of the contract. At the time the contract was mentioned. The essence of the agreement was that it was not necessary to mention a particular time in the contract for the execution of a task. The conclusion is that the essence of the contract was at that time was the parties' original intention for the agreement to be removed from the circumstances surrounding the matter, with the plaintiff offering to make the balance balance on the date specified by the defendant. Did not need. The date and the defendant for the specific performance were not prepared by the date set forth in the plaintiff's promise of transfer of land in favor of the plaintiff. The contract, therefore, was responsible for delivering the decision and the correct decision was given
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Hunza Nagar lawyer