Find a Lawyer

SARDAR MUHAMMAD TARIQ versus SPECIAL JUDGE OF THE COURT FOR SUPPRESSION OF TERRORIST ACTIVITIES, RAWALPINDI DIVISION, RAWALPINDI

Pakistan Penal Code Section 324/353/186/188/148/149/109 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 8/9/13 Pressure on Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), The constitutions of section 4 of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 General Clauses Act (X9 of 1897), section 8 (1) of the special court clearly indicated that the contents of the FIR and other material available on record The trial was to be held for commissions, including crimes. Under 532, the PPC and section 8, under 9 and 13 of the Arms Ordinance 1965, section 109, were read with PPC pursuant to section 32 (1) of the General Clause Act 1897, P. Were set up under the PC. Along with the schedule, non-scheduled offenses were also encountered on a part of the alleged schedule, which was allegedly committed during the same incident and the special court of such non-scheduled offenses also recorded its opinion. Can make a case. To know this, a ll for the offenses for which the trial was to be held, therefore, there was a trial proceeding by the special court in which an incomplete challan was already inconceivable by the special court. Order was submitted, on the basis of which the constitutional application was dismissed [Bakhtiar Ahmed v. State 1991 PCRL J 2398 unwanted] jobs for fresh advocates from Shahdad Pur lawyer