AMIR NAWAB versus HABIBULLAH MINES (PVT.) LIMITED, QUETTA
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 2 (xxviii), 15, 16 and 22A (8) (g) The National Industrial Relations Commission applied to the applicant's worker, although employed by the employer's establishment, but the agreement between the parties was implemented. On the basis of which certain tasks of coal mining were to be done by the applicant in the employer's establishment when the excavation was stopped by the employer for some reasons, a dispute arose between the parties and the applicant. Had filed a civil suit against the employer; PRO was denied the application and creditors agreement between the parties completely urban nature of that contract was negotiated between the parties themselves as to the contractor by profession, so it was not a contract. Section 2 (xxviii) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, had no right to act and to request the jurisdiction of such as the National Industrial Relations Commission, even the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. The element of unfair labor in the sense of sections 15 and 16, which was an essential factor in the jurisdiction of the National Industrial Relations Commission, was not indicated in the petition, the petition filed by the applicant. Was not manageable:
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Khuzdar lawyer