Find a Lawyer

ZAFAR-UL-HASSAN versus PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION CORPORATION

Under Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 section 2 (xxviii) and 34 Pakistan Telecommunications Corporation Act (XVIII of 1991), Section 9 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 Service Tribunals Act, (LXX of 1973), Section 3 (2). Application 34, to maintain the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, was repeatedly objected to by the petitioners against the Establishment of Government Employees on the ground that the petitioner of Pakistan Telecommunication Corporation (PTC) Being an employee is a civil servant and his terms and services are protected as a public servant. In view of the fact that under the provisions of section 9 of the Pakistan Telecommunication Corporation Act, 1991 and the bar contained under Article 212 of the Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, applicants can only request the jurisdiction of the Federal Service Tribunal. It is true that although Pakistan Telecommunication Corporation (PTC) was established corporation, the services and applicants' responsibilities and responsibilities of the applicants in service at the time of the change in the Telephone and Telegraph (T&T) Corporation. Was protected by Section 9 of the Communication Corporation, Act, 1991, as a civil servant N civilians in meaning. The Servants Act, 1973 was read with the Service Tribunals Act, 1973, and it had no right to request the jurisdiction of the National Industrial Relations Commission because a worker's petition filed by the applicants, without jurisdiction, was tolerable. was not criminal advocate from Hub Inds Estate lawyer