SONO versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Sections 1110, 112 and 561 abolish proceedings Police failed to provide details of the location and location of the incident against the applicant, but no private person was cited as a witness. Was. Police said the applicant had a good reputation and that his son was a robber and a notorious criminal who, without precedent, was involved in the violations, the applicant was prosecuted under Section 1110, CIPC. No liability for liability: The order passed under the magistrate was Section 1212, CCP for 12 months, and lasted almost 10 months without any progress before the magistrate misused the court process. Had proceeded against the applicant for and was suspended accordingly.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Khushal Kot lawyer