I.T.AS. NOS.65(IB) TO 68(IB) OF 1992-93, DECIDED ON 16TH MAY, 1995. versus I.T.AS. NOS.65(IB) TO 68(IB) OF 1992-93, DECIDED ON 16TH MAY, 1995.
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Section 156 Error Correction Order The scope of the amendment order extends to cases where there is a patent error and does not require further investigation or inquiry into the face of a person, therefore, error correction. In order to make any mistake in the assessment or refund order under section 156 of the ITO or Income Tax Ordinance, one does not need to consider only the errors which are evident on the face of the order but also on the assessment. The action record can also be quoted or an order to inquire into a refund for a refund that he or she has noticed. Through the Sand has been indicated in the evaluation result of the failure to implement the disputed state of the law department of the Ordinance an error can be corrected by consulting and under 156. Diagnosis was evident from the record
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Sahiwal lawyer