MA (STAY) NO.104/LH OF 1995, DECIDED ON 20TH APRIL, 1995. versus MA (STAY) NO.104/LH OF 1995, DECIDED ON 20TH APRIL, 1995.
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Section 134 (6) was made before the Appellate Tribunal for the application of the demand for appeal, in which the Commissioner Income Tax (Appeal) indicated in its order that the appellant's case in this case. Unable to review and all attempts made to serve him failed to notice him because he was deciding on appeal The decision of the previous appeal by the Commissioner was not appropriate, because If the Commissioner's Process Server cannot detect this diagnosis, it can serve it. Income Tax Officer or Alternative Services Notices may be enforced by Commissioner Prima It appears that the Commissioner, in this case, is too heavy for the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to appeal without the opportunity of hearing the demand from the Assessment. Decided. Until the due date against the assessment or the decision of the appeal which was earlier
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Adda Shaiwala lawyer