Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MA (STAY) NO.104/LH OF 1995, DECIDED ON 20TH APRIL, 1995. versus MA (STAY) NO.104/LH OF 1995, DECIDED ON 20TH APRIL, 1995.


Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Section 134 (6) was made before the Appellate Tribunal for the application of the demand for appeal, in which the Commissioner Income Tax (Appeal) indicated in its order that the appellant's case in this case. Unable to review and all attempts made to serve him failed to notice him because he was deciding on appeal The decision of the previous appeal by the Commissioner was not appropriate, because If the Commissioner's Process Server cannot detect this diagnosis, it can serve it. Income Tax Officer or Alternative Services Notices may be enforced by Commissioner Prima It appears that the Commissioner, in this case, is too heavy for the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to appeal without the opportunity of hearing the demand from the Assessment. Decided. Until the due date against the assessment or the decision of the appeal which was earlier

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
family advocate from Eminabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.