Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SAEED versus EXCISE & TAXATION OFFICER, SAHIWAL

Sections 34, 35 and 36 of the Provincial Motor Vehicles Ordinance 1965 Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Maintaining the Constitution of the Vehicle Exchange Constitution Petitioner did not take advantage of the alternative treatment effect which he claimed he had made in the purchase of the vehicle. The applicant transferred the property in his name after accepting his request, the respondents transferred the ownership of the vehicle to the authority through his application, transferring the vehicle in the name of the applicant. Challenged that the transfer of ownership by the applicant by practicing fraud and forgery Uyzat collection was presented by. The fabricated documents authority accepted the respondents' request and, instead of setting aside the first order for transfer of ownership of the vehicle in the name of the applicant applicant, instead filed an appeal with the competent appellate authority. Instead of challenging the Constitution, he challenged it. The transfer of ownership in the name of the applicant was approved under Sections 34 and 35 of the West Pakistan Motor Vehicle Ordinance 1965; the applicant has to file an appeal under Section 36 of the West Pakistan Motor Vehicle Ordinance, 1965, before the Appellate Authority. The constitutional petitioner was unable to maintain the circumstances, contrary to the order of the relevant authority directly by the applicant. property advocates from Machi Goth lawyer