THE STATE versus RASHID.AHMAD
Clauses / 342/34 & and evidence evidence of / 3434 Review of the evidence The ocular account presented by the complainant was confirmed by all other witnesses in the material details whose existence was proved by medical evidence. He suffered three fireworks injuries during the delay in the incident. In filing an FIR, it was reasonably charged by the prosecution by the prosecution which proved that the plea of defense was considered guilty sentence under the accused under section 2/2 / under 34. The PPC had, under the circumstances, convicted under Section 242424/34. However, the prosecution's witness was accused of assaulting her with no injuries and to that extent the charge was not beyond doubt.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Patika lawyer