Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

THE STATE versus RASHID.AHMAD


Clauses / 342/34 & and evidence evidence of / 3434 Review of the evidence The ocular account presented by the complainant was confirmed by all other witnesses in the material details whose existence was proved by medical evidence. He suffered three fireworks injuries during the delay in the incident. In filing an FIR, it was reasonably charged by the prosecution by the prosecution which proved that the plea of defense was considered guilty sentence under the accused under section 2/2 / under 34. The PPC had, under the circumstances, convicted under Section 242424/34. However, the prosecution's witness was accused of assaulting her with no injuries and to that extent the charge was not beyond doubt.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Patika lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.