Find a Lawyer

CHAIRMAN, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR, COUNCIL versus NISAR AHMAD

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Council Offenders Offense Act 1984 Presence of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Councils Offenders' Ordinance, Section 7 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1995 (VIIth 1974), Section 21, Jurisdiction of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Council The extradition of the fugitive offender Act 1984, challenged on the touchstone of Article 21, the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974, the High Court reversed the transfer of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Council to the February Crimes Act, 1984 on this basis. Declared. The time council set out under section 21 of the Constitution was not present, and therefore, the Act could not be approved and was declared invalid after the council was absent. At the time of the appeal before the Supreme Court, the approval of the ordinance of fugitive criminals was issued by the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Council, 1995, which includes all the provisions of Azad Jammu and Kashmir. There is also a section 7 in the extradition of the Council of Fugitive Offenders Act 1984, under which all the steps taken under the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Council Delivery Act 1984 were ratified to approve the Ordinance, 1995 which stated Notwithstanding any order or order of the High Court, the actions, notifications issued, orders or appointments used under the Old Delivery Act, 1984, shall be deemed to have been initiated, the jurisdiction, or the powers properly executed. ? Made, initiated or used under the Ordinance of 1995 even if it is assumed that the action taken against the respondents is not valid under the Delivery Ordinance, 1984, after the issuance of the Ordinance, 1995 Has been declared, it will be deemed that this ordinance is related to R.S. jobs for fresh advocates from Tando Mohd Khan lawyer