Find a Lawyer

RASHID AND COMPANY versus PUNJAB GOVERNMENT

Once the document has been admitted with evidence, the trial court has no right to have a similar jurisdiction for the trial of sections 37, 40, 35, 36 and 61 of the Stamp Act 1899. There was no jurisdiction where the trial court admitted the document without proof. Consequently, the same was enforced, the order passed by it was not in accordance with the provisions of section 61, the Stamp Act, 1899, the Government has been enforced to protect the revenue of the High Court. Can authorize sending and sending awards at your disposal. The collector had the exclusive jurisdiction of the collector to recover the required stamp duty along with the required penalty, except in cases where the penalty provided under section 35 or section 37, the Stamp Act 1899 The duty provided under was paid. In the absence of an award, the relevant party stamp should not have been admitted into evidence, however, there was no jurisdiction to enforce the case. The decision to pay it and the decision directly under it, the illegal trial court was directed to send the appropriate award to the collector through the High Court decision. law websites from Mithi lawyer