Find a Lawyer

ASADULLAH KHAN versus ABDUL KARIM

The CLC Code Appeals to the Original Decisions of the Ordinance CPC O XLI, R 27 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 12 and 42 of the Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979), section 15 as additional evidence The request for eviction of the respondents against the appellant for the preparation of specific documents resulted in the completion of the order of eviction against the appellant, after which, the defendant filed a lawsuit for specific performance, declaration and injunction. , Which was excluded. During the trial of the suit documents, their support of the relevant claims, which were presented in relation to the relevant period, was said to have existed before the parties to the evidence. Documents that are being sought to be produced by O will not be allowed to present additional evidence as the party will be required to fill in the leftover lacuna, the question of allowing additional evidence to be obtained by such documents Will also not serve the purpose. At the relevant time, the evidence can hardly be termed sufficient or even sufficient supply of X XI, R 27, CPC has argued that only such additional evidence may be allowed to be brought on record at the appeal stage, Wanted to be final or final. There was no case in this case to allow final evidence and additional evidence to be recorded on record for any other purpose. family advocate from Gujrat lawyer