Find a Lawyer

AZIZ AHMED versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH

The Constitution of Pakistan (1973), enrolled in Article 199 in the first year of the MB, the B section class petitioner was named as the senior number 29 in the first list of successful candidates, but the applicant's name was missing in the final list. The excuse that he failed to produce his father's Domicile Certificate according to the R7 (H) of Sindh Prospects of Sindh Colleges. Form but even if such an application was accepted, the applicant should not have heard his name from the final list because it violated the principles of natural justice, justice and fairness and No such action may be taken by the donors / personnel. Not submitting a Domicile Certificate permanently, however, is not related to the candidate's internal eligibility for which to enroll in the admission course even if the Domicile Certificate is relaxed over time if the application is not submitted with the applicant. Can go Official respondents urged that the application form could be rejected due to non-submission of the Domicile Certificate in question, even though the applicant's name could not be mistyped in the final list. The possibility of any academic error cannot be ruled out if his father's name is correctly placed in it, and that the defendant, on account of such academic error, was able to place someone else at the applicant's place. , So the applicant was entitled to declare in favor of this effect. Including his name in the First Air MB, B section, the list of successful candidates was illegal, illegal and had no legal effect and he was awarded MB, B section yesterday. famous high court advocate from FR Peshawar / Kohat lawyer