Find a Lawyer

HATTA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (PVT.)LTD. . versus FAISALABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, FAISALABAD~(

O XXXX, Rr 1 & 2 Punjab Development of States Act (XIX of 1976), S36 Arbitration Act (X of 1940), Section 8 and 20 Recovery of specified amount of land revenue as interim order against such measures. refusal. The option to collect fast money since the residual portion of the land revenue was saved by two conditions, that is, the question that must be paid. And such money should be payable under the Punjab Development of States Act, 1976 - the amount which is legal dues which have been found to be legally payable which is claimed to be in breach of the BF Agreement. Under the agreement, it can be understood, but not the amount owed under the Punjab Development of States Act, 1976 was completely ignored by the trial court for approval while the interim order was denied. , And if the allegedly stringent measures were taken to recover the money, the applicant will suffer irreparable harm. The balance of the facility was also in favor of the applicant, preventing the authorities from collecting the money in the question under the order, the decision to postpone the application under Sections 8 and 20, this condition under the Arbitration Act 1940. It was issued that the applicant, in the event of the applicant's departure, provide the authorities with security for payment of the money in question. lawer from fb area from Jhang lawyer