NASIR MAHMOOD versus DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
There was no evidence in the custody of the West Pakistan Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance 1960 Section 3 (1) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199, to show that Detenio had used arms and ammunition to militants of any political party. Such a militant of the aforementioned political party was named in connection with the other charges that Ditto arranged for the issuance of an arms license to criminals involved in community activities from another province. The police officers in the area did not endorse it through any content. Ditto's involvement in the two criminal cases registered under section 242424, PPC, also did not result, because in one case he was acquitted and in another case he was not involved because the charges against Ditno. The allegations were vague and vague. The termination of any foundation detention order was declared to be without legal authority and had no legal effect. It was directed to release immediately
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Gari Habibullah lawyer
