MUHAMMAD TUFAIL versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, WAZIRABAD, DISTRICT GUJRANWALA
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The Magistrate was acquitted on the police report by the Constitutional Petition, Magistrate against the order of the expulsion of the competing order and he was prosecuted. There was a statement in which he explained that the accused lived physically. After seeing the recordings on and from several days of remand, nothing was recovered and the hearing parties had established the view that although the accused had been named in the FIR, they were still on offense. There is nothing in the record to indicate the involvement of the culprits, the magistrate confessed and applied it to the court. Pay attention to the facts and circumstances of the case and gave reasons for expelling the accused on the basis of the report presented to him under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, and thereafter did not rule out the High Court constitutional jurisdiction. Where the applicant was found. Another appropriate and effective remedy for this is that the private complaint of M. cannot be equated with the dismissal order, therefore, the applicant may file a complaint with the competent judicial magistrate, however, The order had said that if anything came up against them then the accused could be arrested in this case. The applicant may also move the police rank to re-investigate the matter, as there was nothing in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, so that the Investigation Officer, on his own progress or on the instruction of the superior authorities, could have made his previous case. The hearing may be prevented from presenting the report later. Therefore, the magistrate approved
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
