Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ versus STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 (2) Customs Act (IV 1969), Section 156 (1) (77) (82) Guarantee, the accused's grant was not named in the FIR The arrest warrant was approved after the charge sheet was submitted and the trial court proceeded in a five-year-old pending trial to convict the accused in the trial, yet there was no need to retrieve it. Because these allegations were based on documentary evidence that was already available to the prosecutor, the accused was never taken notice of the trial in court and nothing appeared to show It was not known that he had no knowledge of the same trial court that the accused's bail was denied. On the basis of facts which could neither be proved nor were part of the prosecution's case, neither the proceedings of the court nor even the above mentioned order was applicable to the trial court case. Really denied - as the prosecution has stated that sufficient evidence to link the accused was not on record and since the crime was punished for three years, no one was allowed to bail him out. No objection, there is no rational basis. , Was present, to believe that the accused had committed a non-bailable offense, but rather that there were more grounds for further investigation into his crime, therefore, there was no concession, but a right, even to the alleged fugitive. in light of. Accordingly, bail was allowed: [fugitive] attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Eminabad lawyer