KHUDEJA BIBI versus NAWAZISH ALI KHAN
The Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 was compensated by the Trial Magistrate's Order by a Bid Order, a Section 148 Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), a Section 448 Criminal Code (V9 1898), 5 561a. Without giving any valid reason for rejecting the trial court's order after the expiry of seven years, the charge proved that in the amendment against acquittal of the accused, the evidence of the prosecution was indicted by the defendants indicating the contradictions in the sessions court. Not declared. After the new indictment, he sought remand for the trial, which was nothing more than a double scandal for the same crime - the sessions court's order was dismissed by the Sessions Court and accordingly the trial magistrate. Was restored.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Lalamusa lawyer
