MUHAMMAD UMER versus HJ. BEHRANA FIRE TEMPLE PARSI TRUST
Sindh Rented Premise Ordinance 1979 Section 21 (3) Appeal further inquiry Appellate Authority's rent account and rent submission date and the rent and the period for which the tenant was submitted were available on the court record below, all court I can take the High Court. In the circumstances in which Nazir's various news reports were further supported and the tenant is not inconsistent with the tenant who deliberately defaulted in submitting the rent of the house in the future in the dispute, therefore, it is necessary to request Cannot be allowed because the rental controller did not take it for granted. It could not consider the same for the default, High Court of Appeal decision by the tenant, given the fact that section 2: Section (3) of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 was granted by the appellate authority. Granted the High Court more power as an inquiry into the fair decision of the appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Qasba Gujrat lawyer