Find a Lawyer

ALLAH DITTA versus MUHAMMAD ABDUR RASHID

Strengthening Section 13 of the West Pakistan Holding Ordinance, Section 13 (repealed) of the Immovable Property and Displaced Persons Act (XIN of 1975), a joint account that is controlled by evacuation and non-evacuation, the entire account displaced Co-allotment During the process of reinforcement of such allotment, the Collector refused to enforce the part of Khata that belonged to Muslim co-owners. Additional Commissioner directs the implementation of the allotment to the fullest extent: About 2 / 3rd of the certified land of the homeless person is from the Muslim co-owners and it was not for any displaced person to claim against him. The allotment of land was void and the instruction of the Additional Commissioner to enforce the allotment in question would be to the fullest extent possible in the execution of an order which was sufficiently void and against the law. Impact of depriving owners of property that was beyond the jurisdiction of the consolidation courts with their ownership There was no legal option to take part, therefore, the order of the Additional Commissioner was in accordance with the law, when the eviction of illegally evicted non-Muslims was mistaken, such a difficulty. Will be resolved. The pending allotment, through the appropriate forum, was once reformed to delegate powers to the appropriate settlement commissioner and the Board of Revenue in such a forum in which it would grant the rights of allotment to the extent of the Muslim owners. I ordered the allotment order. It does not implement the allotment to the extent that the Muslim share of the joint property in the stabilization process. immigration advocates from Kachhi/Bolan lawyer