Find a Lawyer

NASRULLAH KHAN versus QURESHA

Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The plaintiff in which the trial court appealed the court for declaration of ownership of the house under question, however, dismissed the plaintiff's case which The High Court affirmed. The plaintiffs claim that the house was in Shimlatt and they were involved in the village property, while the defendant had no such rights in which the revenue record was eaten in which the landowner neither owned the village property. Was neither. Thus, Shilamat Deb was shown as the plaintiff, the document of alleged partition prepared by the plaintiff was ambiguous and especially when the defendant was not a party to such act and was not endorsed by any independent evidence. If so, the plaintiff had failed. In order to prove his ownership or his prediction that the question of the house in physical or constructive possession of the interest was pending with the High Court, he openly concluded that the ownership of the house was not proved by the claimant but the circumstances. I was refused to appeal famous high court advocate from Qambar lawyer