Find a Lawyer

RAMZAN BIBI versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE

West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 Section 5 and Schedule Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Suits Marriage Procedures The evidence to prove the marriage contract based on the decision of the Court of Appeal by the Family Court was weak. That the plaintiff was not a confessional witness who married, and that her identity could never be proved before the Family Court, that Nikah's witnesses were not presented during trial and trial court observations. The marriage contract and its signature on the marriage register were different. The trial court and the appellate court were persuaded to believe that the marriage was not available because of a criminal court observation, which was presided over by the district and sessions judge in criminal cases. Was headed by the plaintiff's father who filed a case against the abducted / alleged husband. The court may only be concerned for criminal trial purposes in which the defendant (alleged husband) was acquitted and could not be exercised by the court's jurisdiction / civil court on which to marry. In the light of the evidence, the civil court had to decide the question regarding the authenticity of the marriage contract, which had been made earlier. It was neither illegal nor revolving, based on the judicial court's decision made by the courts below, and it was not meant to read the material evidence presented by the defendant in which it was filed by the defendant. Had failed miserably to prove the facts with the verdict. The following courts were such that were not law-abiding and were arbitrary, perverse and of record. inheritance advocates near Shedani sharif lawyer