ISHTIAQ HUSSAIN versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 426 (1) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 324/34 Sentencing of suspected suspects was short and their appeal was unlikely to be settled in the near future. Was acquitted after the incident. After his maximum sentence, no one was able to recover his illegal imprisonment and on the other hand, if his sentence was upheld or revised, there was no restriction in sending him to jail, The defendants could not be disqualified from filing a revision entry to extend the sentence. In cases of benefit or suspension of the sentence, the accused's sentence was suspended and accordingly he was admitted on bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Dadu lawyer
