Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MURTAZA versus \' MEMBER, FEDERAL LAND COMMISSION, RAWALPINDI

Martial Law Regulation 1972 No 115 Paras 7 and 8 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the West Pakistan Motor Vehicles Ordinance (XIX of 1965), Article 2 (14) by the Federal Land Commission allowed the resumption of land. The applicant has to maintain additional land on the basis of the ownership of the tractor (which was in working condition) under Para 8, Land Reform Regulation 1972 The Federal Land Commission, however, found that the provisions of the Motor Vehicle Ordinance The tractor is not registered under. , 1965, the applicant could not be considered to be the owner whose applicant used his option to surrender the portion of the land he had sold to the seller and after which he had no Was declared to have no legal effect. Property Paragraph 8, Land Reform Regulation 1972, stipulates that only a person registered as a tractor owner can avail of Land Reform Regulation, 1972 in relation to legal reform. The announcer should be the owner of the tractor, which was obtained by a Land Commissioner's officer in good working condition, so the Deputy Land Commissioner, in fact, based on the report of the Revenue Field Staff, concluded this. What the applicant owns is the owner. The tractor was entitled to take advantage of Para 8, the Land Reforms Regulation, 1972 the Federal Land Commission had given itself the wrong direction, saying that unless the tractor was registered in the name of the owner, he could not take advantage of Para 8, Land. The Reform Regulation, 1972 was declared, therefore, the right to retain additional land under para 8, the Land Reform Regulation, 1972, female advocates from Matiari lawyer