YASIN KHAN BABER versus THE STATE
Section 302/324/34/109/120B The West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13D Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 575 was charged with only 18 complaining parties. Had advanced threats. A few days before the incident, neither the FIR was charged with the accused in which it was contracted to commit a crime, nor was there any material available that could indicate that Such an agreement was made through Section 120B, PPC, therefore, the preliminary aspect was that the affidavits of the twelve senior advocates on record did not indicate that the accused who was an advocate was also present at that place. Was not where he allegedly threatened the complaining party as he was attending a meeting elsewhere at the relevant time. The case was culpable and he was arrested under circumstances for misusing the pending prosecution of the accused.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Ghazi lawyer
