Find a Lawyer

SHERAZ ASGHAR versus STATE

Section 302 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) FIR was filed by an eyewitness, listing the names of the assailants, operating with weapons, the active role played by them, and the names of eyewitnesses. ? It was not possible to identify the fault in daylight. Medical evidence was not contradictory to the prescription. Disappearance of the stimulus could not eradicate positive confidence. The impressive ocular evidence was substantially different from that of the defendant's accompanying accused, and neither the investigation was dishonest nor the bead below The courts reviewed the prosecution's evidence and the defense's plea and without seeking any false news or reading the evidence and the facts were not sought for any unlawful interference with them, The leave of intervention appeal was denied in the circumstances. solicitors from Lodhran lawyer