DISTRICT OFFICER EDUCATION, SHEIKHUPURA versus TARIQ MEHMOOD
Arts 199 and 212 ()) challenge the order of the competent authority of the government employee to decide the issue in the constitutional application before the High Court scope civil service appointment case regarding the appointment of public servants. Even though he was in service, he was neither charged nor paid for his salary. Plaintiffs, through a competent authority, demanded that the government employee's appointment order was forged and therefore dismissed because of a government employee's appeal before the service tribunal, which was dismissed. On disqualification on the ground that no final order was passed before the Supreme Court instead of considering the Tribunal as offensive, a constitutional petition was filed before the High Court, which was allowed and believed He is well-appointed and, in a speech to a competent authority legally authorized, the appointment order of public servants barred from joining the service was forged, which requires the solution of serious questions, so high. The use of constitutional jurisdiction by the court was not enforceable, in which case the public servant would approach the self-service tribunal. And after his appeal was dismissed, he chose to file a constitutional petition before the High Court instead of challenging the order before the Supreme Court; the High Court should have kept the mandate of Article 212 (3) of the Constitution. , The High Court's decision was not sustainable in the circumstances. Allowed and the High Court's adverse judgment set aside \ r \ n
