Find a Lawyer

RUBY AKHTAR versus S.M. ASLAM

Qazf (Enforcement of Limitation) Ordinance 1979 Section 3 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Arts 24, 25 and 120 Civil Procedure Code (V8 of 118), O VII, R 11 suit for recovery of damages due to Qazf limit The request to dismiss the plaintiff's date will be the date on which the defendant's charge of adultery against the defendant was found to be baseless and not the date on which the adultery was committed. Was not To prove whether such allegations were true or whether the defendant had committed adultery charges primarily against the plaintiff on 27 12 1987 and then 31 198 1988 during the litigation between the parties. A lawsuit was filed on the basis of which the crime was proved. According to the Federal Shariat Court, the right to claim the defendant, accordingly, was charged with the plaintiff on 28 August 1992 when a decision of the Federal Shariat Court was announced which resulted in the defendant being charged with Kazaf A. Ali was sentenced. Articles 24 and 25, the Limitation Act would not apply because they were related to the offense and the suit was filed for recovery of damages due to suzaf which had special meaning and it covered false charges of adultery. Gone, while the terms `label` and slander are common. The terms and conditions of the application shall be applicable as there is no specific article for the cases of Gaddafi, Resident Article 120, Limitation Act 1908 and the limitation period for filing the case will be the date of the decision of the Shariah Court ie. 28 7 1992 The suit filed within one month from such date was such that, in the case of Plaintiff within time, OVII, R 11, C (d) of CPC could not be rejected. ? famous lower court advocate from Wah Cantt lawyer