Articles 5, 7 and 2 (2) of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 set aside the plaintiff's wife in her case to recover the restitution allowance after receiving the pre-emptive decree, the defendant's husband gave the verdict. Appeal for the same evidence to be kept aside. The husband was recorded, but as the court hours were overturned, the request for a cross-examination was adjourned for the next day, but his request was rejected and his request for the retrieval of witnesses was made. Was also excluded and the previous order passed against her husband was set aside. The court should have had the opportunity to cross-examine the wife without giving the wife a chance to inspect the wife without notice, because she had submitted a registered confession for taking notice of her husband. Was against the previous part. For her absence, the decree was passed that the court would seek the separation of the former parliament in favor of the wife and against her husband because the court was of your duty to give the wife the opportunity of cross-examination, but He was not given such an opportunity, although under relevant provisions of the law, at any stage, a witness could be summoned by a court order to deliver a verdict with justice, the case was remanded. The decision should be made after giving the wife an opportunity to examine her husband
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
