HAIDER JAFFER versus THE STATE
Pakistan Penal Code S, 420/468/471 Corruption Prevention Act (Second of 1947), Section 5 (2) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Termination of Section 561 proceedings and civil action pending against the other directors. Was. The court was sued by two Queensbench Division London companies and accused in Pakistan for fraudulently defrauding the bank or producing fake documents, therefore, the most suspected central suspect in the case was the High Court and the trial court. The source is bad, the accused could not. He was accused of being a British citizen and dealing with debt clearances and documents, so, after being in England, the trial court proceeded to prosecute the accused. There is abuse that can happen. Harassment should not be allowed otherwise if the prosecution was allowed to present evidence in the trial against the accused, it was unlikely to be punished as the main accused had already been acquitted of the charge. , Pending proceedings against the accused were suspended under circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Risalpur lawyer