Find a Lawyer

8HAKIL AHMAD versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Under Article 199 of the Art 199 and 212 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), the transfer of the Constitution under Article 199 of the Civil Service Constitutional application jurisdiction transfers the simplicity of the terms of service to the simplest terms and challenges Not open, however, the transfer orders were issued in the exercise of force or in excess of the statutory limit, such as having final orders, would be subject to challenge and scrutiny where the order challenged before the High Court was Malala. Was either under jurisdiction or the quorum was illegal. Under Article 199 of the Constitution, the High Court can always be sought where the expulsion of power was exercised by the constitutional legislation where there was more interference in matters than in cases where the Constitution resulted. The constitutional jurisdiction could not be taken by anyone. In both cases, however, interference in the face of alternatives would be exempt, if so effective, by treating Article 212 (2) of the Constitution itself, as effective, the High Court's jurisdiction. The rule will set very strict rules for exercising the constitutional jurisdiction. The court has not been completely removed in connection with service matters under the scope of the service tribunal, especially where the alternatives available through the service tribunal are equally effective, in the case of bead wish or jurisdiction. And the jurisdiction under Article 199 could not be lightly ignored. However, the constitution was arbitrary and its application could not be allowed where it resided law websites from Silanwala lawyer