Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RASHID versus STATE

Section 5 of the Explosives Act 1908 was convicted and sentenced for possessing four bombs, the articles recovered from the timer suspects were a watch by Kasio Japan, which contained small pieces of electrical wires that were first used. Aspect could not be used as explosive device. , And by no means can be under the definition of explosives because the alleged prosecution, in the circumstances, had absolutely failed to establish the circumstances which led to the heightened or reasonable suspicion that the equipment recovered from the accused was illegal. The prosecution that was for use was solely relied on by the expert. In the previous case, the suspects stated that they were not placed before the accused during the investigation, that the document could not be weighed, and the court did not charge the accused. The conviction was punished and the accused was acquitted, giving him the benefit. Doubt top civil advocates from Choa Saiden Shah lawyer