Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus STATE

Section 302/307/34 Appraisal of evidence The motivating part of the prosecution's story as the injured prosecutor's witnesses did not question the accused, both the injured witnesses who had no inclination to indulge in false accusations. But the accused had fired 12 bore guns and the 12 bore carbine, who was 30 years of age, had suffered wounds and when he died after suffering some injuries, he died. The accused hit Soto's head, resulting in the victim's death. The suspect also gave a number to the prosecution's witnesses. There was no possibility of wrongful identification of the perpetrators, as well as the prosecution's witnesses received injuries and a defensive version of the firearm and two assault rifles which were injured as a result of the shooting. Was. The other injured injured prosecution witness, who went wrong due to the complaint, could not be accepted in view of the two weapons and the injuries found on the victim's body and the injured prosecution witness could not be doubted simply because the investigation. The articles / utensils required for laundry were not seized by the officer prosecution, therefore, he successfully proved his case against the experts. Any reasonable doubt and the trial court properly sentenced the accused jobs for fresh advocates from Fateh Jang lawyer