Find a Lawyer

SALEEM AKHTAR versus NUR MUHAMMAD KHAN

The Special Relief Act 1877 Section 54 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115 for a permanent injunction for the plaintiffs / respondents, claims that their property in the village concerned is located in the village and the respondents / applicants. Was not authorized In order to cause any interference in their ownership, the plaintiff denied the claim of the plaintiffs and said that the dispute is well owned in the village courts based on the oral evidence of the parties as well as the village Patwari. Was based on the essence of the Daily Diary. The dispute regarding the actual location of the disputed well can be resolved only by a satisfactory delimitation of the relevant fortress numbers of land owned by the parties, which are oral evidence of the parties and the evidence obtained from the village Patwari's diary. I was insufficient for a satisfactory decision, without the objections of the opposing party. The contentious point Appellate Court did not care much about reading the record to give different verdicts, and its approach was slightly superficial until the case, which resulted in the case. Was found to be guilty of wrongdoing and under the revised jurisdiction Or rejected the decision and orders placed aside. The decision under the law should be taken first under the courts and on the remanded case registration advocate from Kamalia lawyer