MUNAWAR BIBI versus MUHAMMAD AMIN
In the Guardians and Wards Act 1890 Section 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the trial court found that the applicant (mother) was living in an immoral alliance with her sister's husband. , Can remain in the custody of children. The appellate court did not partially accept the appeal and did not accept the custody of the daughter. The appellate court remanded the High Court to maintain that the trial court's sentence taken by the mother was restored. The trial court's finding in connection with his residence was misleading. Immoral alliances with her daughter-in-law for ex-husbands After the implementation of the Hudood ordinance, they generally try to involve their ex-wives in false cases of adultery so that they can be deprived of custody of the children and the husband. So was the mother of the children. Had already been acquitted by the trial court which reinforced the notion of innocence in their favor. It is a fact that if the husband filed an appeal against the eviction, he will not terminate the condition. n The High Court should not have heeded allegations of bad character being imposed by the children's father against their mother; their former husband, the High Court, claims that the mother was not in a position to care for her children. And it was completely inadequate to keep him from it. In any case, they were in custody; an appeal was allowed to consider the father's obligation to care for the minor children, whether the High Court mother was allowed to deprive the custody of her minor children. Or not
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Kamalia lawyer