JAVED NAWAZ versus STATE
The request for leave to appeal the Pakistan Penal Code Section 365 Terrorism Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 89 and 185 (3) was the 1990 Ordinance. I have to be edited. And amending the Eleventh Terrorism Activities (Special Courts) Act 1975 to include Section 365A, the PPC was abolished and at the time of submission of the section 365A invoice, the PPC was a scheduled offense. Was closed, the special court had no jurisdiction to hear the case and that it could not be re-enforced after the termination of an ordinance, the High Court in the case of Muhammad Naeem v. State (1992 SCMR 1617). I have said that depending on the decision of the Supreme Court in the case to stop this case. Effect can be given to the re-introduced ordinance from its earlier date, which is still in the field and bound to all the courts of Pakistan. Section, PP5A, is part of the PPC pass history schedule. Sentenced and sentenced on the accused, so special leave to appeal by special court special court was denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Swabi lawyer