Find a Lawyer

IKHLAQ HUSSAIN versus LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

The Land Acquisition Act, 1894, was in the possession of Section 23 Litigation Act (IX of 1908), Article 149 of government-owned claimants who claimed financial compensation, followed by, or in favor of, alternative plots for the claim of the photo-claimant. Is in possession of. Being negative on underground land, at the end of the sixty-year legal period, became fully owned and thus entitled to compensation for its acquisition, not the real owner of the land - the government. It was made a party to it, no property rights could be declared due to the negative possession, only on such score the plaintiff could not be sued. Was set while his absence was also identified. The trial court, pending in the previous case by one of the defendants on the case of adverse possession, did not correct the error, the court found that the negative possession of the plaintiff was not held within a fixed period of 15 years. Nor will it create the question of obtaining a prize through negative possession, as it would have led to a final decision on a property claim. The question as to the reason for the occupied possession by the plaintiff will eliminate the case. The plaintiffs did not claim the negative possession claim that they were not entitled to compensation for the land acquired. law firms from Ghari Dupatta lawyer