Find a Lawyer

TARIQ MAHMOOD versus ZARDA BEGUM

The West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 Section 5 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 2 (9) and 13 of the 13 foreign judgment plaintiffs (husband) and defendant (wife) were British subjects and based on the evidence permanently there in the United Kingdom. Was based in a court of law. The case for the restoration of marital rights was filed by the husband through a lawyer claiming that the decision on the question of the foreign court was not binding on the exception made under section 13, CPC and he The marriage is entitled to the decision to restore the marriage. Both the plaintiff and the defendant did not appear in court to make the statement because they were based in England permanently because of foreign subjects and litigation from their parents as a result of the litigation. In fact, the two spouses were in fact married and the children of their spouse are neither citizens of the state of Jammu and Kashmir nor residing in the jurisdiction of the jurisdiction, restoration of marital rights. The order could not be passed in favor of the husband and it was not properly granted by the trial court. Was [jurisdiction] list of advocates from Kot Addu lawyer