Section 115 (1), for the first time, was dismissed by the High Court for failing to submit certified copies of certain documents as was the first section under section 115 (1), owned by CPC. I concede, the record and proceedings (R&PS) of the two courts were available with the High Court on the date of the revision petition hearing so that they could hear and decide on the merits request. , But still chose to exclude the applicant on a technical basis without demanding the applicant. It is imperative that the stringent approach adopted by the High Court, which strikes the spirit of the judicial system to deliver justice to the competent, cannot be approved by the advice of both parties that a review application be granted for 20 years. Is outdated, it can be remanded to high. According to the court and the law for disposing of the merit, the Supreme Court put aside the unconstitutional order in the circumstances and remanded the case to the High Court for disposal of the merit.
