Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SULTAN versus DISTRICT JUDGE

Clause 5 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 and Scheduled Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), both of the children who were cared for were important and not trivial, the petitioner claimed. That their children do not deserve to grow up. No claim for rehabilitation, no issue was given the impression that the children were living for no good reason other than the applicant (his father). The record does not show that the applicant raised any such request or insisted on setting up such a case. Therefore, the High Court rightly refused to interfere with the Family Court order exercising its constitutional jurisdiction. There is no case for interference by the Supreme Court as there was no material available before the Supreme Court in the aspect of the factual dispute case. The leave to appeal was denied on the grounds inheritance advocates near South Wazirstan lawyer