Find a Lawyer

GHULAM HAIDER BADINI versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Television Receiving Apparatus (Authorization and Licensing) Rules 1970 R1 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 4 and 25 Secretariat Allowance were granted to employees serving outside the headquarters of the corporation at the corporation's headquarters. Were serving Corporation employees of the Television Corporation, performing the same duties as their own duties and were equally qualified for their appointments, were subjected to similar training and had equal skills, skills and Had the skills needed to perform well in different stations. No justification for the corporation, with such a particular group of officers appointed at the headquarters of the corporation for such preferential treatment, on the one hand discrimination and internationally recognized and recognized principles, equality, fair play and There is a violation of justice that can be enjoyed by the protection of the law. To be treated in Arundan, every citizen has a right to the law wherever it may not be harmful to the interests of any individual, nor any order passed by any artist, person and executive authority in accordance with the law. Or a directive that violates fundamental rights. If there is no prohibition against any contemporary law, it will be invalid. There is no law behind the notification under which the employees of the corporation were deprived of the benefits that were being given to a group of employees, its authenticity is questionable. All people were to be treated equally. As in the circumstances and circumstances both of the privileges and responsibilities of the Headquarters through the Secretariat / Personal Allowance famous supreme court advocate from Kundina lawyer