SAFIA AZIZ versus DIL ARA MALIK
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 212 (3) Appeals to the Sovereignty Against the List of Servers Listed by the Service Tribunal, the Supreme Court sent the Service Tribunal to determine the interfaith sanity of the legal employees in the preliminary period of litigation. Was abolished. However, it was subsequently issued by the respondents of the department and subsequently an amendment application was filed on the same appeal. The pending appeals service tribunal has allowed the amendment of the appeal memorandum. Because of this, he had the latest cause of action, so, the amendment request was misconstrued, before the final list of seniority confirmed that civil servants had been in conflict for several years. In view of the decision of the International Seniority Service Tribunal to stay the victim's and Supreme Court's preliminary injunction, allow the pending appeal to be amended, the pending appeal amended to determine the intercity claim in the final arbitration list. The decision about the service tribunal was unimaginable, even in the application for leave of appeal to the public There was no specific question about the law of significance as prescribed under the provisions. The leave to appeal Article 212 of the Constitution was denied in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Mian Walli lawyer