SHAZIA NASIM versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE
On the basis of section 5 and marriage, the marriage solution was conditionally required to deposit 20 tolas of gold jewelry or Rs. 80,000 in return, as compensation to the husband, made by the husband to the wife. Nor did the husband make any claim in his evidence for the return of such jewelry, as the wife could not be subject to the return of the gold as compensation for the grant of Khulna / Khalifa. The payment of the jewelry or its value was a condition of granting Khola to be kept, so the appellate court's decision, without any legal authority, was set aside and to the extent that Khulla subjected him to the return of the gold jewelry. Was or Instead, pay a certain amount
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Hafizabad lawyer
