Find a Lawyer

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX versus GOPI CHAND RAWAT

Review of Stock Closure R2B (2) Regulation of Indian Wealth Tax Rules, 1957 Regardless of the regular account recovery, it has not been found that the accounts are regularly maintained by the Assisi Tribunal. There is justification that R 2 B (2) was not applicable. Indian Wealth Tax Act, 1957, Section 27 Indian Wealth Tax Rules, 1957, R2B (2) The question of law does not arise: [CWT v. Moti Chanda Daga (1988) 174 ITR 379 (Raj). Not agreed]

Related judgments — Rajasthan High Court India, 1995

• COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX v. AMAR SINGH RATHORE 1995 PTD 728
• COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX v. MAN BAHADUR SINGH 1995 PTD 732
• P.K. TIWARI v. COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX 1995 PTD 832
• COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX v. KANCHAN BAI BADER 1995 PTD 960
• COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX v. SMT. JYOTSANA BAID 1995 PTD 1089
• COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX v. SETH GOKULDAS PRADEEP KUMAR (NO.1) 1995 PTD 1207
• COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX v. SETH GOKULDAS PRADEEP KUMAR (NO.2) 1995 PTD 1218
• COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX v. A.S. RATHORE 1995 PTD 1274

All Rajasthan High Court India judgments of 1995 →

pakistani advocates Sohawa District Jelum lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes