Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF KAYANI versus AZAD GOVERNMENT

Section 30 (2) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), the factors determining Section 46 seniority will be considered for the determination of seniority of the Judicial Officers. In determining the sanity of the Judicial Officers, the High Court had to consider who sought to highlight the appellant's own personal qualities regarding the qualifications, qualifications, past experience, integrity and duration of service of the Judicial Officers. Was about a good judicial officer, but failed to say that the competing defendant had any of these characteristics. It was inferior to them, in the absence of any comment on the competence or conduct of the competing defendants, it can be assumed that when determining the sanity, the High Court's position was that the competing respondents were either better. The High Court was not only the Court of Appeal or Revision, but also the Aadhaar-Jammu and Kashmir Interim Authorization Act, 1974, which was included in the seniority list or its reputation of performance, past experience, credibility, etc. Also has the power to oversee and control it under Section 46 of the Act. All other courts that perform subordinate courts 'subordinate courts' affairs, which are decided by subordinate courts under the auspices of judicial officers, often come up for consideration before the High Court and the High Court as well. Be fully aware. The decisions, credibility and experience, and all the other factors set forth in Section 30 (2) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Courts and Law Code Act 1949, which were to be considered for the determination of seniority. property advocates from Dandot lawyer