HABIB-UR-REHMAN versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB
EstCode, 1989, P1041, paragraph 4 of the Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII 1974), Section 10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution of the application of the constituent authority to be appointed as Deputy Commissioner in the provisions of one of the major districts of Estacode. Will Which applicant explicitly stated that the applicant could not claim the matter as a matter of fact as the selection of the Deputy Commissioner was posted, despite the fact that he was initially the DMG (District). Management group) in the transfer and civil posting. The servant was at the discretion of the concerned government; regarding the applicant's field posting, he was not found suitable for any such posting; he was posted during his service; serious allegations were made against him. And criminal cases were registered. A list was kept against it by private respondents, which implemented their own application to facilitate reaching the correct decision of the court. Due to the sensitivity of the deputy commissioner in the administration and being critical, the applicant post claimed that anyone could be considered fit, while in every posting, serious allegations of corruption, corruption etc. Were imposed. Took notice of the fact that the cases filed against the applicant and the inquiries made against them should have been decided in one way or the other High Court also noted with concern that such serious allegations against the petitioner Although he served in his home province's High Court, he was, however, the chief secretary of the province and the federal government's secretary of state.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Hangu lawyer