CANTONMENT BOARD versus KHURSHID AHMAD
Constitution of Pakistan Paras 6 & 7 (1973), Article 185 (3) Permanent Transfer of Property Transfer to Respondents by Deed Property Cinema, Cantonment Board begins to receive car parking fee outside such property car parking fee The cantonment board was rejected for submission and appealed to the High Court in the same manner it was reviewed, however, the authenticity of the plaintiff's lawsuit issued by the settlement authorities shows that That only the rights of evacuation and interest in relation to the building have been transferred. The defendants had no mention of the premises, and the trial court and the appellate court dismissed the defendant's case, while the high court re-appealed the evidence of his trial. Appeal was approved to determine whether the building as well as the cinema premises. In question, the respondent was transferred
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Feroz Walla lawyer