MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus MUHAMMAD HAMIDULLAH SHEIKH
West Pakistan Civil Service (Executive Branch) Rules 1964 R 9 (3) Punjab Civil Servants (Appointment and Terms of Service) Rules, 1974, R8 (2), Explanation of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) of persons. Applicants were promoted in 1974 after qualifying the Provincial Civil Service Examination in 1973 by the initial recruitment and promotion intercourse respondent appointed by the applicants were given more positions than the initial recruiters. Respondents' representation against the seniority of the applicants was rejected by the Department Authority Service Tribunal, as defined in R8 (2). Job civil servants (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules that have been assigned to the defendant under synyrtyryty 1974 he qualified with the first batch with the first batch in 1973. Such officers were appointed in 1973, the fact that respondents joined the job along with the second batch of officers in 1974 did not matter to D and considered joining the job in 3 197 service in. Will, before they are promoted to appointments, therefore, they will be entitled to assign seniority rather than promotion to the petitioners, at the time they have joined the Explanatory Service Rules. ; The Punjab Civil Servants (Appointments and Terms of Service) Rules, 1974 had not yet been enforced, so as long as Punjab had the protection of the rights of the seniority, therefore, the amendment of the role could not be so limited. Was to lose them. Leave appeals were allowed to examine the material that they had already acquired before the new rules came into existence.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Hyderabad lawyer